Comments on: Sarah Failin’ Case #001

By: William Thode

William Thode — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:23:26 +0000

Rush Limbaugh never held elected office as a Republican.

And what damage has he done? I’d surmise that Michael Savage and Alex Jones (both purely insane) have done more damage. Hell, Mark Sanford has done more damage than Limbaugh.

By: larry

larry — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:59:28 +0000

I feel like rush Limbaugh has done more to embarrass the republican party than Palin will ever be able to do.

By: William Thode

William Thode — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:27:03 +0000

Yes, I said a couple sentence explanation is fine, but not three paragraphs for something that simple and just end in a “maybe.”

Anti-intellectualism? You do realize one of its biggest supporters in the media uncovered videos that forced at least two White House officials to resign?

I could do that, serious cat, but the problem is that would take hours of time I don’t wish to waste. A few key examples, on policy points important to me (like the straight-line veto,) is all I really wish to spend my time on.

By: Serious cat is serious

Serious cat is serious — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:27:28 +0000

The tea party movement is a truely democratic force and liberals are doing themselves a disservice by mocking it. They should instad go after the anti-intellectualism and demagoguic leadership that is soon to be it’s undoing.

Will, real issues are more complicated than can be answered with a yes or no. If they were simple and obvious, there’d be no disagreement. To say Obama’s long winded is insufficient. You must prove he could be more concise by restating his message in fewer words without losing nuance, or address him point by point and prove him wrong.

By: William Thode

William Thode — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:39:10 +0000

Nice, lou, an attack on my intelligence. When he goes into at least a three paragraph dissertation to answer the simple question if he supports the straight-line veto, I take pause. See, for me, that’s a really simple answer. It’s either yes or no with maybe a sentence or two explanation for reasoning behind the decision. Not three paragraphs of nothing and then ending with a “maybe.”

He doesn’t really say anything but looks good saying it.

Good, Trevor, explain Beck and then explain Limbaugh. Because although I am a fan of Beck, I’m not wasting my only full day at CPAC waiting to see him.

If you guys want, I could craft the game you’ll play while you watch the speech. I know his common phrases enough.

And apparently, you like Saul, Trevor.

And, for the record, as a political leader, Palin is crap. She’s not an idiot, but rather a light weight. She should just stump for candidates to raise money for them.

It took me an hour interview with Glenn Beck to fully realize this. Even he got annoyed by her constant use of “common sense.”